Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama’s Way

Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama’s Way.

U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen ordered federal agencies to cease implementing Obama’s amnesty plan.


Chris Curtis /  Chris Curtis /

An attorney for Sheriff Joe Arpaio made a filing with the federal judge who ordered the halting of President Obama’s executive amnesty, asking that a hearing be held on Obama’s refusal to comply with the court’s order.

The attorney, Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, stated to the judge in the filing:

“Several reports indicate that the executive branch under the Obama administration has not complied with this court’s temporary injunction, but continues full-speed to implement a grant of amnesty and related benefits to approximately 5 million citizens of foreign countries who are illegally in the United States under the defendants’ November 20, 2014, executive action programs implemented by several memoranda issued by Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson.”

Advertisement-content continues below

U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen ordered federal agencies to cease implementing Obama’s amnesty plan; but, since then, Obama has warned that “one federal judge” will not stand in his way toward implementing amnesty.

Obama, according to the Washington Times, “told a Miami crowd that he will move ahead with his executive action on immigration and vowed that his administration will become even more aggressive in the weeks and months to come.”

Klayman noted in the filing: “The Obama administration is continuing to signal not only its disagreement with the court’s order, which is its right, but beyond that its non-compliance with the court’s order.”

Advertisement-content continues below

He went on to write:

“In short,” Klayman told the court, “President Obama’s defiant pledge in Miami, Florida, on February 25, 2015, to move forward aggressively with implementation of his deferred action amnesty by executive over-reach …  more than suggests that the Obama administration is continuing to implement the executive action amnesty in defiance of the court’s temporary injunction.

“Given the strong reports that DHS is continuing to implement the programs that the court enjoined, the court should issue an order to show cause and call for clarification and assurance from the defendants that they are and will comply with the court’s temporary injunction, and if not take immediate remedial actions to [ensure] that the order is being complied with.”

Klayman also noted that Obama is threatening “consequences” to federal employees who obey the federal judge’s ruling to cease implementation of his amnesty.

Share this article on Facebook and Twitter if you believe that Obama has blatantly ignored the judge’s ruling and the rule of law.


Homeland Security Secretary: My Job is to “Give Voice to the Plight of Muslims” – Freedom Outpost

Homeland Security Secretary: My Job is to “Give Voice to the Plight of Muslims” – Freedom Outpost.

My goodness! When are Americans going to have enough of the federal government advancing the religion of pieces? “Homeland Security” Secretary Jeh Johnson sides with Barack Obama about not getting at the root of the terrorism taking place in the world today, Islam. In fact, recently, Johnson said that it was part of the administration’s job to “give voice to the plight of Muslims.”

“We in the administration and the government should give voice to the plight of Muslims living in this country and the discrimination that they face,” he said. “And so I personally have committed to speak out about the situation that very often people in the Muslim community in this country face; the fact that there are 1.6 billion Muslims in the world and the Islamic faith is one about peace and brotherhood.”

They will trip all over themselves and fall flat on their faces to call any terrorism “Islamic.” They will do anything to promote Muhammad’s religion and political ideology over and against Christian values.


In simple taqiyya style, Johnson claims not only is it the job of the government to give voice to the plight of Muslims, but then promote Islam as a religion of peace and brotherhood.

Quite simply, this is nauseating to hear, but not unexpected. First, we’ve covered in several places that Islam, at its core, is not peaceful (unless you submit to it). Its history is filled with violence. In fact, I recently wrote about our own history and just how Islam is woven into the fabric of our history in the Barbary Wars.

When one starts pointing out the issues of Islam, the ridicule always comes out saying that someone is “xenophobic” or “Islamophobic,” even “racist,” as though Islam is a race. While many Middle Eastern people are automatically assumed to be Muslim, that is not always the case. Take for instance, the Christians that have been slaughtered like cattle by those that embrace Muhammad’s death cult.

Secretary Johnson, like all of Obama’s appointees is a corrupt man. This guy, according to the Homeland Security website, “oversaw the development of the legal aspects of many of our nation’s counterterrorism policies, spearheaded reforms to the military commissions system at Guantanamo Bay in 2009.”

Reforms like spending your tax dollars to make Islamic jihadists more comfortable. Even though he was not in the current position, one might wonder what part Johnson has played in the release of several jihadists, including the illegal swap of five top Taliban leaders for American deserter Bowe Bergdahl.

It is because of Johnson that we recently heard the ridiculous claim that “right-wing extremists” are more of a threat to America than their buddies in the Muslim Brotherhood and its various front groups, who are operating with impunity in our borders and visiting our White House.

Many don’t remember, but Johnson was behind the wicked scheme to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in 2010, which allowed open sodomy in the military that dropped the morale of our men and women in uniform and also led to an all-time high of sodomite rapes.

Neither Johnson nor the administration nor the federal government’s job is to “give voice to the plight of Muslims.” The federal government is charged with a few things in our Constitution. In the branch Johnson participates in, his agency isn’t even authorized to be in existence, much less given a voice!

America, this administration does not love America. They hate it with a passion, which is why they want to “fundamentally transform” it. Why would you transform that which you claim to love? With all of his moral faults, former Mayor Rudy Giuliani was right about that statement, but for those of us who have been paying attention, we’ve known it since before his first term in office.

Don’t forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

Panicking Fed Desperate to Keep Machinations Secret

Panicking Fed Desperate to Keep Machinations Secret.

The stage is set for one of the most important legislative battles of the 114th Congress.

On the first day of the new Congress last month, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) reintroduced H.R. 24, the popular “Audit the Fed” bill, a measure first championed by former Rep. Ron Paul of Texas.

Shortly thereafter, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) introduced the Senate version, S. 264, with 30 co-sponsors.


It didn’t take long for the Washington Establishment to react with outrage – maybe because they know this bill now has an excellent chance of becoming law.

Shortly after Sen. Paul introduced S. 264, the Wall Street Journal online, in a column that reports on Global Central Banks, carried a headline “Yellen Prepared to Fight a Revived ‘Audit the Fed’ Movement.”

Wall Street Journal reporter Jon Hilsenrath noted that former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke had strenuously resisted such a proposal and that current Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen recently went on record saying that she would “forcefully make the case” against it.

Surveying the opposing forces, the Journal reported, “Ms. Yellen will have President Obama on her side again if the bill gets new life. She will also have the central bank’s 12 regional bank presidents, an influential but little seen force in Congress with strong connections in the deep-pocketed business and banking communities around the country.”

Apparently, the Fed isn’t taking any chances.

In the past few days, nervous Fed Governors have fanned out across America to denounce the effort on TV and in high-profile speeches.

Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser warned that it would empower Congress “to audit and question monetary policy decisions in real time.”


“Audit the Fed” sponsor Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)

Apparently forgetting the secretive and intensely political deals the Fed made with big banks during the 2008 financial crisis, Plosser added with a straight face, “This runs the risk of monetary policy decisions being based on short-term political considerations instead of the longer-term health of the economy.

Of course, it’s preposterous for the Fed to suggest it is not “political” while simultaneously lobbying elected officials at full tilt, including huddling in secret meetings with members of the Democrat Party.

Underscoring how nervous Washington’s power players are, Alan Blinder, a former Fed Vice Chairman who is currently advising Hillary Clinton, penned an insulting op-ed in the January 28 print edition of the Wall Street Journal, headlined “Beware of Woolly-Minded Attacks on the Fed.”

Blinder, a Princeton University economics professor, specifically targeted the “Audit the Fed” proposal, calling it “an old standby that has been rejected by Congress several times.”

Blinder is deliberately twisting the facts. Let’s review the record.

Former Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) introduced the original “Audit the Fed” bill in the 112th Congress, and it passed the House of Representatives by an overwhelming majority of 327-98 on July 25, 2012. In the 113th Congress, Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA) reintroduced Dr. Paul’s bill and once again it passed the House of Representatives on September 17, 2014 by a crushing margin of 333-92.

On both occasions, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) employed his usual obstructionist tactics and refused to schedule the popular bill for a Senate vote.

So Professor Blinder is lying when he argues Congress has rejected the bill. The truth is that one senator, Harry Reid (acting at the behest of Barack Obama and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke), scuttled the legislation.

It is likely that H.R. 24 will once again pass the House of Representatives by an overwhelming margin. If it achieves just 75% of its prior House support, the bill will still enjoy a veto-proof majority. Then the action will move to the Senate, where Harry Reid, now the Minority Leader, will no longer be able to bury it.

The Sound Money Defense League is firing up grassroots pressure to persuade Senate Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby (R-AL) and especially Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to schedule a vote.

Your support for the Sound Money Defense League is needed to make sure this happens.

Senate Democrats, possibly joined by some Establishment Republicans, could still derail the bill by mounting a filibuster. In that case, the bill would need 60 votes to pass.

Even if the bill passes the Senate, it is certain that President Obama will follow the advice of Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen and veto the bill. Congress could only override the veto by a 2/3 vote.

Achieving that will be a challenge, especially with the Fed using any means necessary to defeat the bill. Get ready for the Big Banks (remember they literally own the Fed) and the Washington politicians to flood the media with predictions of economic doom if the bill passes. Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, and Janet Yellen will all play a major propaganda role.


The key to success is to fire up enough grassroots pressure that the bill receives bipartisan support in the Senate, as it already has in the House.

So far, one Senate Democrat, Sen. Mazie Hirono (D–HI), has broken ranks and signed on to co-sponsor the bill with Sen. Paul. With enough grassroots pressure, more Democrats are likely to join her.

After all, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act (the bill’s formal name) is hardly a revolutionary idea. Congress and its accounting arm, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), routinely perform oversight, including audits, on federal agencies that are a lot less powerful than the Federal Reserve.

Of course, that’s really the point.

The Federal Reserve has become so powerful and so immune from critical scrutiny that its central role in economic policymaking is zealously hidden from public view.

That’s why this battle is one of the most crucial fights of this Congress. With your support today the Sound Money Defense League will mobilize the vital grassroots pressure needed to defeat the power brokers in Washington and on Wall Street.


Join the ranks of the Sound Money Defense League with a gift of $10 or more, and we’ll even send you one free silver coin (or even 4) as a symbol of Sound Money! Please do it now:


‘Global Warming’ Biggest Science Scandal Ever – Conservative Byte

‘Global Warming’ Biggest Science Scandal Ever – Conservative Byte.



False data has been given over and over again so that funding will continue. Liberals love this since they can than control the lives of people.
Check it out:

When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.

Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.

This was only the latest of many examples of a practice long recognised by expert observers around the world – one that raises an ever larger question mark over the entire official surface-temperature record.

Continue Reading on